Review Criteria
Papers should demonstrate scholarly quality as evaluated on the strength of the methodology used, the quality/depth of the theoretical foundation, and the quality/depth of the analysis and related discussion. In addition, these should maintain a high level of scholarly quality, reflecting on how this work extends/is distinguished from other work attempted in similar areas.
This set of review criteria will be applied for all papers:
- Context: effectiveness of relating this work in demonstrating a strong knowledge of related and prior work.
- Significance: how this submission is important and makes an important contribution to accreditation or engineering education.
- Relevance: how the work advances frontiers in education or accreditation within the context of ICACIT Symposium.
- Scholarly Quality: how the submission demonstrates appropriate rigor and reflective depth when outlining the novel practice at their and other institutions. A high impact paper in this category is one that develops new and intriguing insights in the context of ongoing research, and/or presents preliminary analysis of empirical data.
- Language and Expression: the organization, language and English expression used in the submission is appropriate and facilitate the understanding.
